Recent Blog Posts

What is a Confession of Judgment, and why is my Lender or Lessor asking me to sign it?

By Stark & Stark on December 1st, 2010

Posted in Business & Corporate

As the economy continues to restrict the availability of credit to small businesses, many borrowers are finding that lenders with which they have had long and mutually beneficial relationships have been restricting lines of credit or adding additional requisites to extend or renew existing lines of credit. Principals of newer small businesses may be shopping for credit for the first time, or are presented with a first commercial lease. Continue reading

Billboards: Real or Personal Property When Taken by The Government

By Stark & Stark on December 1st, 2010

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

On November 1, 2010, the New Jersey Supreme Court refused to review a decision by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey holding that a billboard located along the New Jersey Turnpike was not “real property” under the Eminent Domain Act of 1971. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Witt, et. al., Docket No. A-0995-09T3 (App. Div. July 15, 2010). Continue reading

Who needs a Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-aside Arrangement (WCMSA) ?

By Stark & Stark on November 15th, 2010

Posted in Personal Injury

On November 11, 2010 I was part of a seminar panel addressing this issue. The recommended method to protect Medicare’s interest when settling a workers’ compensation claim for a Medicare beneficiary is through a Medicare set-aside arrangement (WCMSA). This allocates a portion of the Workers’ Compensation settlement for future medical expenses. The amount of the set-aside is determined on a case by case basis, after review by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Once CMS determines the set aside amounts, the money is put into an account for use only towards medical bills related to the work injury. Continue reading

Pennsylvania Health Care Law: What Are “Never Events”?

By Stark & Stark on November 11th, 2010

Posted in Personal Injury

Just a few years ago, Pennsylvania was moving towards the monitoring of “preventable serious adverse events” or “never events” in acute care facilities in Pennsylvania. Progress on “preventable adverse events” has been inordinately slow but substantial in the Commonwealth. Unfortunately, the progress coincides with financial strains. The Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council reported this year that Pennsylvania acute care hospitals experienced a reduction in net income of $865 million from FY08 to FY 09. The loss was largely due to losses in investment income and other non-operating income. Continue reading

A SAFE HARBOR FOR EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS: Employment Policies Offer Protection

By Stark & Stark on November 10th, 2010

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

When discrimination occurs in the workplace, the aggrieved employee should bring the inappropriate behavior to the attention of the employer, who, ideally, would then investigate the allegation and take prompt, appropriate remedial action. What happens, though, when, after an employer conducts an investigation and then reprimands or terminates the offending employee, the aggrieved employee continues to pursue legal action against his or her employer? Can the employer still be held liable even though the employer took prompt, remedial action? Continue reading

Sudden Medical Emergency Doctrine

By Joseph A. Cullen on November 5th, 2010

Posted in Personal Injury

Last month I addressed the defense of “sudden emergency.” This month I would like to discuss the defense of “sudden medical emergency” or “unforseen unconsciousness” defense. This is a defense which is generally rarely used in motor vehicle cases. Under Pennsylvania law, the sudden medical emergency defense, also called the “unforseen unconsciousness” defense, is a complete defense to an action based on the asserted negligence of a defendant driver of a motor vehicle. Continue reading

Minority Oppression: Stealing

By Stark & Stark on October 25th, 2010

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

Stealing from the minority shareholder or the corporation itself is a form of actionable oppression. Sometimes shareholders simply steal. More often than not, the bad actor will employ a number of techniques in order to covertly steal from the corporation. One widespread technique used by dishonest shareholders is the false inflation of expense accounts. Another technique is to place a relative (usually the majority shareholder’s) spouse or children on the company’s payroll at regular salaries even though those people never actually perform services for the company. Continue reading

Possessory Interests in Real Estate

By Barbara Strapp Nelson on October 20th, 2010

Posted in Real Estate

The names set forth on a deed may not always reflect the interests of all parties in the real property. One such interest is a possessory one of a spouse to joint possession in property occupied as a couple’s principal matrimonial residence. This type of interest is a statutory creation. N.J.S.A. 3B:28-3 provides that during life every married individual shall be entitled to joint possession with his spouse of any real property which they occupy jointly as their principal matrimonial residence and to which neither dower nor curtesy applies. Continue reading

The Sudden Emergency Doctrine

By Joseph A. Cullen on October 7th, 2010

Posted in Personal Injury

Pennsylvania Courts have acknowledged the “sudden emergency doctrine” as a relevant defense in determining whether a driver was negligent in a car accident. See Lockhart v. List, 665 A.2d 1176 (Pa. 1995). The “sudden emergency doctrine” recognizes that a driver, who, although driving in a prudent manner, is confronted with a sudden or unexpected event which little or no time to comprehend a situation and act accordingly should not be subject to liability simply because another perhaps more prudent course was available; rather, under such circumstances, a person is only required to exhibit an honest exercise of judgment. Continue reading

Multiple locations to better serve your needs—

Hamilton, NJ

100 American Metro Boulevard
Hamilton, NJ 08619
Phone: 609.896.9060
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 609.896.0629
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Philadelphia, PA

One Liberty Place, 1650 Market St., Suite 3600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: 267.907.9600
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 215.564.6245
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Marlton, NJ

40 Lake Center, 401 NJ-73, Suite 130
Marlton, NJ 08053
Phone: 856.874.4443
Secondary phone: 888.241.7424
Fax: 856.874.0133
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Yardley, PA

777 Township Line Road, Suite 120
Yardley, PA 19067
Phone: 267.907.9600
Fax: 267.907.9659
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

New York, NY

5 Pennsylvania Plaza 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10001
Phone: 800.535.3425
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Bridgeton, NJ

78 W Broad St
Bridgeton, NJ 08302
Phone: 856.874.4443
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer