Claims of an Executor Contrary to Interest of the Estate

By Stark & Stark on September 10th, 2018

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

Once an individual is appointed as the Executor of the Estate, the Executor may utilize Estate funds in order to undertake actions which are in the best interests of the Estate. Such actions may include defending against claims brought against the Estate by beneficiaries, potential beneficiaries, or third parties.

Another instance may involve bringing claims on behalf of the Estate in an attempt to enrich and increase the corpus of the Estate. These may be claims against parties who have may have taken Estate funds, or against other entities in an attempt to increase the corpus of the Estate. One category of actions, however, for which an Executor may not utilize Estate funds, is to either defend or prosecute actions which only either protect the interests of the Executor or seek to increase the assets of the Executor. Under these circumstances, an Executor would not be permitted to use Estates funds in such actions.

Both the case law and the relevant statutory law is clear that an Executor is entitled to use Estate funds to either protect the corpus of the Estate or to increase the corpus of the Estate. As discussed above, this may also include either include prosecuting or defending actions on behalf of the Estate.

At no time, however, may the Executor act in self-interest by solely seeking to protect their assets or to increase assets for their own use which run contrary to the interests of other beneficiaries of the Estate. Under those circumstances, this individual must utilize her own funds and not interests of Estate funds. Should an Executor of the Estate utilize Estate funds for their own self-interest, this Executor will be required to repay these funds back to the Estate.

If you are serving as an Executor to an Estate, you should be well aware of the Court Rules and case law which address utilizing the Estate funds. It is also suggested that if there are any uncertainties, that they consult with a probate litigation attorney to determine the best course of action.

Multiple locations to better serve your needs—

Hamilton, NJ

100 American Metro Boulevard
Hamilton, NJ 08619
Phone: 609.896.9060
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 609.896.0629
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Philadelphia, PA

One Liberty Place, 1650 Market St., Suite 3600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: 267.907.9600
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 215.564.6245
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Marlton, NJ

40 Lake Center, 401 NJ-73, Suite 130
Marlton, NJ 08053
Phone: 856.874.4443
Secondary phone: 888.241.7424
Fax: 856.874.0133
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Yardley, PA

777 Township Line Road, Suite 120
Yardley, PA 19067
Phone: 267.907.9600
Fax: 267.907.9659
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

New York, NY

5 Pennsylvania Plaza 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10001
Phone: 800.535.3425
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Bridgeton, NJ

78 W Broad St
Bridgeton, NJ 08302
Phone: 856.874.4443
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer