Pennsylvania Law Monitor

Pennsylvania Law Monitor Blog

Child Custody in Pennsylvania: “Best Interests” Enumerated Under New Law

By Stark & Stark on March 8th, 2011

Posted in Pennsylvania Law Monitor

On January 24th of this year, child custody law in Pennsylvania changed. Previously, child custody disputes where decided by a judge based upon the “best interests of the child” standard. This broad standard gave litigants, counsel and judges broad discretion in deciding what facts and factors constituted “best interests.” The new law helps focus the best interest inquiry and will aid in removing personal biases of judges, create more uniformity in decisions, and allow for better reasoned and more child-centric custody decisions. Continue reading

In Pennsylvania “Reasonable” Attorney’s Fees is a Subjective Standard

By Stark & Stark on March 1st, 2011

Posted in Pennsylvania Law Monitor

In Pennsylvania, common interest community associations are creatures of both real estate law and state statutes. A condominium’s enforcement authority is rooted in restrictions that both run with the land and are recorded as restrictive covenants with the deed clerk of the county where the common interest community is located. The primary statute for condominiums within Pennsylvania is the Uniform Condominium Act (68 Pa.C.S. § 3101 et seq). Continue reading

Medical Malpractice and the Mental Health Procedures Act

By Stark & Stark on August 25th, 2010

Posted in Pennsylvania Law Monitor

The Mental Health Procedures Act (MPHA) establishes the procedures for the treatment of mentally ill patients in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Of course, medical malpractice can and does occur to mentally ill patients in Pennsylvania who are subject to the MPHA under a 301 or 302 commitment. The typical Plaintiff in a medical malpractice will have committed suicide while being treated at a facility pursuant to the MHPA Continue reading

Battle Between Heirs to the Simon Mall Fortune Highlights Common Will Disputes

By Stark & Stark on April 19th, 2010

Posted in Pennsylvania Law Monitor

Melvin Simon, together with his brother and business associate Herbert Simon, built a business empire upon the then novel concept of the shopping mall. The company that he and his brother founded – Simon Property Group, Inc. – is now the largest mall owner on the United States with over 300 shopping malls in its property portfolio. Continue reading

Discharging a Mechanics’ Lien Claim by Surety Bond or Payment of Cash into Court

By Stark & Stark on January 20th, 2010

Posted in Pennsylvania Law Monitor

A Mechanics’ Lien Claim can present problems for Owners seeking to sell or refinance a home or other real estate. Likewise, higher-tiered Contractors and Subcontractors can encounter headaches where a Subcontractor files a Lien Claim of questionable legitimacy or for defective work, jeopardizing the Contractor’s reputation or relationship with customers. Continue reading

The Doctrine of “Consentable Lines” Resolves Some Property Line Disputes Between Adjoining Land Owners

By Stark & Stark on December 3rd, 2009

Posted in Pennsylvania Law Monitor

One of the most common sources of litigation involving real property is that of disputes between adjoining property owners. Of these disputes, many involve a disagreement regarding where the property line between the two parcels of land is actually located, and one party’s objection to his neighbor’s use of the property beyond the legal boundary between the properties. Pennsylvania has a well-developed practical approach to such disputes where a line between the properties has been respected and acquiesced to for a requisite period of years. Continue reading

Demolition, Excavation, and Landscaping under the Pennsylvania Mechanics’ Lien Law

By Stark & Stark on August 10th, 2009

Posted in Pennsylvania Law Monitor

Often times, Demolition contractors and Landscaping contractors will ask whether their services and the materials used in their trades constitute a proper basis for a Mechanics’ Lien Claim in order to preserve a likelihood of payment. Knowing what is, and what is not properly lienable work and materials is something that every contractor should be mindful of when assessing different jobs. Continue reading

Multiple locations to better serve your needs—

Hamilton, NJ

100 American Metro Boulevard
Hamilton, NJ 08619
Phone: 609.896.9060
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 609.896.0629
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Philadelphia, PA

One Liberty Place, 1650 Market St., Suite 3600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: 267.907.9600
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 215.564.6245
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Marlton, NJ

40 Lake Center, 401 NJ-73, Suite 130
Marlton, NJ 08053
Phone: 856.874.4443
Secondary phone: 888.241.7424
Fax: 856.874.0133
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Yardley, PA

777 Township Line Road, Suite 120
Yardley, PA 19067
Phone: 267.907.9600
Fax: 267.907.9659
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

New York, NY

5 Pennsylvania Plaza 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10001
Phone: 800.535.3425
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Bridgeton, NJ

78 W Broad St
Bridgeton, NJ 08302
Phone: 856.874.4443
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer