Business & Commercial Law

New Jersey Law Blog

In a Divorce, Are Retirement Accounts Subject to Equitable Distribution?

By Stark & Stark on August 26th, 2011

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

I have found that many of my clients who are going through a divorce have a lot of misconceptions regarding the division of their retirement accounts they established before their date of marriage. My clients’ initial impressions have been mixed. During initial consultations, some clients have informed me that their spouse would be entitled to 50% of the total retirement account, while others seem to believe that their retirement account is not subject to equitable distribution because it originated before their marriage. Continue reading

Under the Consumer Fraud Act, a Spiritual Loss Is Not an Ascertainable Loss

By Stark & Stark on August 12th, 2011

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

A recent published case with a unique set of circumstances serves as a reminder that for a plaintiff to prevail and secure treble damages under the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), not only must the plaintiff show that the defendant committed unlawful conduct, that plaintiff must also be able to demonstrate that he suffered an ascertainable loss. Continue reading

New Jersey Supreme Court Holds That Individuals May Be Held Personally Liable for Regulatory Violations of the Consumer Fraud Act

By Stark & Stark on July 14th, 2011

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

On July 7, 2011, the New Jersey Supreme Court expanded the reach of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), arguably already the most extensive of consumer protection laws in the United States, and held that under certain circumstances, owners and employees of a corporation may be individually liable for regulatory violations of CFA undertaken by them through the corporate entity. Continue reading

Minority Oppression – Appointment of A Custodial Receiver

By Stark & Stark on July 7th, 2011

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

In previous blog entries, I focused on the causes and final remedies available in minority oppression cases. This posting focuses on what happens during the pendency of the litigation if the parties cannot run the subject company. Depending on the circumstances, the Court possesses the inherit power to appoint a custodial receiver to manage the subject corporation’s affairs during the pendency of the minority oppression claim. See, N.J.S.A. 14A:12-7(4). A custodial receiver is generally charged with protecting and preserving the corporation itself while the case is pending. Continue reading

Litigation Hold Letters – Do I Need to Comply?

By Stark & Stark on June 3rd, 2011

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

So you’ve received a litigation hold letter demanding that you cease from destroying any evidence. One of the first questions that comes to mind is – “Do I need to comply?” Essentially, a litigation hold letter requests that the recipient (either an individual or company) cease from destroying any documents, both physical and electronic, that may be relevant to litigation. The litigation may be currently pending or the party may be threatening future action. Compliance with the letter depends upon whether you: (1) are a party to the pending litigation; (2) are a non-party to a pending litigation; or (3) anticipate being made a party to a lawsuit. Continue reading

New Jersey Supreme Court “Splits the Baby” on the Entire Controversy Doctrine

By Stark & Stark on June 1st, 2011

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

In any complex litigation, there are potentially numerous claims that could be asserted against an even greater number of parties. For example, a Condominium Association could bring a construction defect claim against a developer. The developer, in turn, could have claims against the subcontractors it used, its insurance carrier, its suppliers and its consultants. Continue reading

Protect your Identity: Exercise your Right of Publicity

By Stark & Stark on March 10th, 2011

Posted in Business & Commercial Law

Have you ever wondered what you’re worth? No, not your “net worth” (i.e. the cumulative value of your assets less any debts or liabilities), but the commercial value of your name, identity, image or likeness. Yes, you have a right of publicity: the right to control the use of your name, picture, voice, image or likeness, and to prevent another from using the same for commercial benefit without your consent. Continue reading

Multiple locations to better serve your needs—

Hamilton, NJ

100 American Metro Boulevard
Hamilton, NJ 08619
Phone: 609.896.9060
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 609.896.0629
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Marlton, NJ

40 Lake Center, 401 NJ-73, Suite 130
Marlton, NJ 08053
Phone: 856.874.4443
Secondary phone: 888.241.7424
Fax: 856.874.0133
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Yardley, PA

777 Township Line Road, Suite 120
Yardley, PA 19067
Phone: 267.907.9600
Fax: 267.907.9659
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

New York, NY

5 Pennsylvania Plaza 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10001
Phone: 800.535.3425
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Philadelphia, PA

The Bellevue 200 S Broad St #600
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Phone: 267.907.9600
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 215.564.6245
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Bridgeton, NJ

78 W Broad St
Bridgeton, NJ 08302
Phone: 856.874.4443
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer