Ambiguities in a Will – The Doctrine of Probable Intent

By Paul W. Norris on October 5th, 2022

Posted in Probate Litigation

In rare instances, during the administration of an estate, there might arise an ambiguity within the language of the decedent’s Last Will and Testament as to how the decedent wished to dispose of his property pursuant to his Will. Should that occur and the beneficiaries are unable to resolve that issue, a Court will be tasked with determining what the true intentions of the decedent were with regard to the disposition of his estate. In a recent appellate division case, the appellate division reviewed a trial court’s application of the Doctrine of Probable Intent, where the court found that an ambiguity existed within the language of a Will.

In this matter, the Chancery judge had found the Will contained an ambiguity concerning the disposition of the decedent’s estate, applied the doctrine of probable intent, and thereafter, held that decedent’s son’s interpretation of the Will made no sense. On appeal, the disgruntled son argued that the trial court had misapplied the doctrine of probable intent, and further, had erred by excluding conversations from evidence that the decedent had with his attorney and his daughter after executing the Will. In denying the son’s appeal, the appellate Court found that the Chancery judge’s findings were supported by sound credibility determinations, that trial judge did not abuse his discretion by excluding his sister’s testimony, and further that there was no evidence that the decedent’s intent was what the son had argued. As such, the son’s attempt to introduce evidence outside of the terms of the Will to interpret the document was denied by the appellate court, as the appellate court concluded that the trial court’s determination of the probable intent of the decedent was correct.

The doctrine of probable intent is rarely applicable during the administration of the estate, or even during a Will contest. Nonetheless, it is important for a potential contestant, or party who was defending a Will against a challenge, to carefully review the terms of a Will to determine whether an ambiguity exists in the document which could affect the ultimate disposition of the estate. The application of the doctrine of probable intent is different for every case and is extremely fact sensitive. As such, this doctrine is something that must be considered during the course of administering an estate or in the context of a Will contest.

Multiple locations to better serve your needs—

Hamilton, NJ

100 American Metro Boulevard
Hamilton, NJ 08619
Phone: 609.896.9060
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 609.896.0629
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Philadelphia, PA

One Liberty Place, 1650 Market St., Suite 3600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: 267.907.9600
Secondary phone: 800.535.3425
Fax: 215.564.6245
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Marlton, NJ

40 Lake Center, 401 NJ-73, Suite 130
Marlton, NJ 08053
Phone: 856.874.4443
Secondary phone: 888.241.7424
Fax: 856.874.0133
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Yardley, PA

777 Township Line Road, Suite 120
Yardley, PA 19067
Phone: 267.907.9600
Fax: 267.907.9659
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

New York, NY

5 Pennsylvania Plaza 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10001
Phone: 800.535.3425
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer

Bridgeton, NJ

78 W Broad St
Bridgeton, NJ 08302
Phone: 856.874.4443
county best pa pennsylvania reviews south jersey berks northhampton montgomery bucks lehigh valley gloucester burlington mercer